LOCAL GOVERNMENT SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAM (LGSI)
Guideline for Local Government Self-Insured Employee
Health Benefit Programs
Conducting Independent Claims Reviews
Adopted March 2002 by the State of Washington Health and Welfare Advisory Board
PURPOSE:
This guideline is to assist local government self-insured employee health benefits programs subject to RCW 48.62 (programs) in conducting independent reviews of their third party claims administration. The claims process differs from a financial review, which is not addressed herein.
POLICY:
As provided in Washington Administrative Code 82-60-050(3), all programs are required to have an independent review of their third party claims administration conducted at least every three years. The State of Washington Health and Welfare Advisory Board (Board) and the State Risk Manager strongly support programs having appropriate operational and procedural elements (below) of their medical/pharmaceutical program independently reviewed more frequently than three years to assure claims are being paid accurately. The extent and frequency of claims reviews is dependent upon program and plan complexity, third party administrator (TPA) performance and previous claims reviews. A review focused on one or more specific performance area(s) below can more than offset review costs while assuring the plan is being correctly administered and protecting program employees. Dental and/or vision programs may be reviewed less often and/or as needed.
CLAIMS REVIEW
The program and firm conducting the claims review should develop the scope of the claims to be reviewed and the review evaluation criteria. The sampling basis used for the claims review can be based upon a random sampling, a specifically focused sampling (such as individuals for whom payments during a defined period exceeded a designated amount) or a combination. For a random sampling to be statistically representative of the entire program, it should be based on a larger, stratified selection of claims.
Claims review audits may include:
Claims Sample ReviewReview claim sampling for:
- Consistency with third party administrator contract performance measures;
- Accurate inputting of all data including procedure codes, diagnosis codes, provider identification and charges
- Proper application of all plan exclusions and limitations, including annual and lifetime limits
- Correct recovery of stop loss/excess insurance and extent to which claims runs correctly aggregate multiple claims to one occurrence;
- Accurate and efficient administration of preferred provider arrangements (discount application, incentive benefits, efficiency of information transfer);
- Compliance with applicable governmental laws and regulations;
- Whether claim charges were covered by the plan when claims incurred;
- Appropriate tracking of deductibles and 'out of pocket' maximums;
- Proper coordination with other sources of insurance, including coordination of benefits (COB), Medicare and third party liability;
- Claim payments made to proper payee based on claimant assigned benefits to the provider;
- Charged amounts reviewed for reasonableness and suspect providers identified;
- Professional medical review of questionable charges and review of inpatient hospital charges for billing errors;
- Duplicate claim payments;
- Work-related claims are not paid;
- Claims are not paid for pre-existing conditions;
- Claim payments are properly authorized and documented;
- Charges are entered correctly and payments are properly coded as to service type;
- Claim overpayments are promptly identified and refunded to the Plan sponsor;
- Explanation of Benefits (EOB's) and other correspondence are clear and informative;
- Claims processed within a reasonable time period from date of receipt and requests for additional information are necessary and efficiently administered;
- Claimant is an eligible employee/dependent or qualified participant covered at the time claim was incurred. Accurate information supplied by plan sponsor and appropriate execution of eligibility verification;
- Negotiated fee arrangements (provider discounts, contracted fees) accurately administered and capitated service agreements are correctly accounted and not reimbursed separately;
- Claims are not paid until it is established services were properly
referred and/or authorized including:
- Applicable primary care physician authorization and/or service referral;
- Plan authorization for specialty services, out of network services;
- Compliance with utilization review programs such as hospital and surgical review, outpatient procedure review, case management and mental health network arrangements;
- Consistency with third party administrator contract performance measures;
- Data transfer between plan sponsor and claims administrator;
- Eligibility maintenance, including capacity for historical data, cross referencing, security measures, claims systems interactions (edits for waiting periods, dependent age limits, etc.);
- Controls for identifying plan maximums/limits (including system edits, flags for accumulators, etc.);
- Accurate interpretation and system programming of all plan provision;
- On line edits and features to assure medical claims processing accuracy, identify potential ineligible charges, flag questionable providers and/or charges requiring referral for medical review and prohibit duplicate payment;
- Operational ease, extent of manual intervention, audit trails, etc;
- Physical/access security and quality control within claims processing system;
- Provider maintenance and security (fraud control, etc.);
- Administration of preferred provider discounts and other negotiated fee arrangements;
- Capture of required data elements for processing/reporting;
Evaluate TPA claims processing procedures including:
- Consistency with third party administrator contract performance measures;
- Establishing actual claims lag to determine/validate program IBNR;
- Procedures for call tracking and documentation;
- Correct crediting to program of all returned checks and/or overpayment recoveries;
- Procedures for following up on outstanding overpayments
- Claims submission procedures and forms;
- Enrollment, eligibility verification and record keeping processes;
- Procedures for tracking COBRA participants eligibility;
- Delegation and documentation of administrative responsibilities;
- Required claim documentation and procedures for investigating coordination of benefits, subrogation, work-related injuries;
- System for handling claims pending receipt of additional documentation;
- Quality assurance and internal audit systems;
- Interaction with managed care (utilization review and contacted) providers;
- Recording systems for production, backlog and turn-around time;
- Explanation of benefits (EOB's), claims denials and other communication with plan participants for consistency, readability and usefulness;
- Procedures for plan change documentation and implementation;
- Administrative guidelines and materials available to claims examiners;
- Customer service functions including inquiries, eligibility verification to providers;
- Efficiency of general work flow patterns;
ALTERNATIVE CLAIMS REVIEW PROCESSES
The State Risk Manager and the State Health and Welfare Advisory Board have approved programs using the following measures to comply with Washington Administrative Code 82-60-050(3):
- When several public entities share the same third party claims administrator, programs may have a joint review performed, which examines the processing of a sampling of each activity's claims. In some instances, smaller programs have been permitted to review the report done for another program using the same TPA and relate the report findings to their own clams processing activities.
- Coordinate with the program broker having the program stop loss insurance carrier perform a review of the third party administrator's processing of program claims.