|
|
SUBSECTION 4.3.3.2 |
|
4.3.3.2.1 |
Introduction |
Effective Date: |
Mar. 1, 1999 |
|
The United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has published several circulars establishing uniform principles for determining the allowability of costs incurred by nonfederal entities expending federal awards. In addition, these circulars provide requirements for the development and submission of cost allocation plans and indirect rate cost proposals. State agencies and institutions perform functions and activities that are either federally assisted or provide central service support to federally assisted programs or activities. As such, they are subject to provisions of the cost principle circular applicable to their activities. |
|
4.3.3.2.2 |
OMB Circular Applicability |
Effective Date: |
Mar. 1, 1999 |
|
4.3.3.2.2.a |
Circular A-87 - Establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts and other agreements with state and local governments and federally recognized Indian tribal governments. This Circular is applicable to all state agencies and institutions other than public institutions of higher education and publicly owned hospitals and other providers of medical care described in paragraph d. below. The Circular also provides: |
|
4.3.3.2.2.a(1) |
Requirements for the development and submission of cost allocation plans and indirect rate cost proposals for these nonfederal entities; |
|
4.3.3.2.2.a(2) |
Specific requirements on the distribution of state/local government central service costs, including provisions on the development and submission of state/local government central service cost allocation plans, and; |
|
4.3.3.2.2.a(3) |
Requirements for the development and submittal of state public assistance cost allocation plans. |
|
4.3.3.2.2.b |
Circular A-21 - Establishes principles for determining costs applicable to grants, contracts and agreements with educational institutions (Higher Education). This Circular also provides requirements for the development and submission of facilities and administration cost proposals (indirect). |
|
4.3.3.2.2.c |
Circular A-122 - Establishes principles for determining costs of grants, contracts and other agreements with nonprofit organizations. Colleges and universities, covered by Circular A-21, are specifically excluded from coverage by this circular. The Circular also provides requirements for the development and submission of indirect cost rate proposals. |
|
4.3.3.2.2.d |
Federal Awards administered by publicly-owned hospitals or other providers of medical care are subject to requirements promulgated by the sponsoring federal agencies. |
|
4.3.3.2.2.e |
Entities receiving sub-grants of federal awards are subject to those federal cost principles applicable to the subrecipient organization. |
|
4.3.3.2.2.f |
All central service and department/agency costs that are allocated or billed to educational institutions, hospitals or other providers of medical care or services by other state or local departments or agencies are subject to Circular A-87. |
|
4.3.3.2.3 |
Statewide Central Services Cost Allocation Plan (SWCAP) |
Effective Date: |
Mar. 1, 1999 |
|
4.3.3.2.3.a |
Most governmental units provide certain services such as accounting, computing, payroll services, motor transportation, etc., to operating agencies on a centralized basis. Since federally, supported awards are performed within the individual operating agencies, a process is necessary to identify these central service costs and assign them to benefited activities on a reasonable and consistent basis. The federally reviewed and approved, statewide, central service cost allocation plan provides that process. |
|
Two basic methods are used in the plan to assign appropriate costs of centralized services to operating agencies or their programs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The state of Washington prepares and submits to the federal government an annual central services cost allocation plan. One part of the plan justifies and reconciles the activities of the billed state central services (internal service, self-insurance and fringe benefit). A second part allocates the allowable costs of other state central services benefiting agencies expending federal awards. The Accounting Division of OFM prepares and administers the state’s plan (SWCAP). |
|
|
4.3.3.2.3.b |
State of Washington central, billed internal service activities have the following responsibilities: |
|
4.3.3.2.3.b(1) |
Understand and adhere to the requirements of Circular A-87, particularly those provisions relating to maximum allowable amounts of working capital and annual net income at, or exceeding, $500,000. |
|
4.3.3.2.3.b(2) |
Ensure that the following information is made available for inclusion in the state plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.3.2.3.c |
State of Washington central, self-insurance fund activities have the following responsibilities: |
|
4.3.3.2.3.c(1) |
Understand and adhere to the requirements of Circular A-87, |
|
4.3.3.2.3.c(2) |
Ensure that the following information is made available for inclusion in the state central services plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.3.2.3.d |
State of Washington central, fringe benefits activities, including pension and post-retirement health insurance plans, have the following responsibilities: |
|
4.3.3.2.3.d(1) |
Understand and adhere to the requirements of Circular A-87 |
|
4.3.3.2.3.d(2) |
Ensure that the following information is made available for inclusion in the state central services plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.3.2.3.e |
State of Washington operating agencies and institutions, administering or expending federal awards have the following responsibilities: |
|
4.3.3.2.3.e(1) |
Unless prohibited by federal /state laws or regulations or formal funding limitations (Refer to examples in Subsections 4.3.3.2.4.b & c), operating agencies are to include the fixed cost allocation from the approved, state central service cost allocation plan in their agency indirect cost/cost allocation pool; |
|
4.3.3.2.3.e(2) |
Any indirect costs or cost allocation amounts recovered, as a result of a SWCAP cost allocation amount being included in an agency’s indirect rate or cost allocation plan, are to be deposited as a recovery in the state General Fund 001 utilizing revenue source 0301. Refer to examples in Subsection 4.3.3.2.4 following. |
|
4.3.3.2.4 |
Central Services Cost Allocation Illustrations |
Effective Date: |
Mar. 1, 1999 |
|
4.3.3.2.4.a |
EXAMPLE 1 - Agency and Central Services Indirect Costs are Reimbursable |
|||||
|
Assumptions The agency indirect cost plan included the following: |
||||||
|
Item |
Amount |
Indirect |
||||
|
Agency Direct Costs |
$1,000,000 |
|||||
|
Agency Indirect Costs |
220,000 |
22% TDC |
||||
|
Total Agency Costs |
1,220,000 |
|||||
|
Central Services Allocation |
30,000 |
3% TDC |
||||
|
Total Cost Per Plan |
$1,250,000 |
25% TDC |
||||
|
The agency's indirect rate is 25 percent of Total Direct Costs (TDC), computed as follows: Agency indirect costs of $220,000 plus State Central Services Allocation of $30,000 is total indirect cost of $250,000 divided by direct costs of $1,000,000 is 25 percent TDC rate. The 25 percent TDC rate computed per the agency's annual indirect cost plan has been approved by the agency's cognizant federal grantor agency. The agency requests payment from its federal grantor agency for work performed under a federal grant activity. The payment request is computed as follows: |
||||||
|
Direct Cost Reimbursement |
$50,000 |
|||||
|
Payment Requested |
$62,500 |
|||||
|
Procedure - Revenue Source Coding When the $62,500 is received from the federal grantor agency, the state agency is to identify and code the federal revenue as follows: |
||||||
|
Reimbursement For |
Amount |
Account |
Source |
Sub-Source |
||
|
Agency Direct Costs |
$50,000 |
xxx |
xxxx |
xxxxxx |
||
|
Agency Portion of |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Central Services Portion |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total Revenue |
$62,500 |
|||||
|
The receipt by the agency of $50,000 for agency direct costs and $11,000 for agency indirect costs represents the recovery of agency expenditures incurred in the performance of the grant or contract. These amounts represent revenue of the agency's operating fund. However, the receipt of $1,500 for Central Services Costs represents recovery of State Central Services furnished without cost to the agency, and thereby represents revenue to the state General Fund. |
||||||
|
4.3.3.2.4.b |
EXAMPLE 2 - Only Agency Indirect Costs are Reimbursable |
|
Assumptions Circular A-87 states that federal agencies are to reimburse state agencies for their overhead or indirect costs, except where restricted or prohibited by law. The facts in this example are the same as in Example 1 above, except that federal law limits the reimbursement for indirect costs for a particular grant program to 20 percent of direct costs. The agency is thus limited to a payment of $60,000 for direct and indirect costs from the federal grantor agency for work performed under a federal grant activity. The agency will receive $50,000 for agency direct costs and $10,000 (20 percent x $50,000) for agency indirect costs. |
|
Procedure - Revenue Source Coding When the $60,000 is received from the federal grantor agency, the state agency is to identify and code the federal revenue as follows: |
||||||
|
Reimbursement For |
Amount |
Account |
Source |
Sub-Source |
||
|
Agency Direct Costs |
$50,000 |
xxx |
xxxx |
xxxxxx |
||
|
Agy Indt Costs (20%) |
10,000 |
xxx |
xxxx |
xxxxxx |
||
|
Total Revenue |
$60,000 |
|||||
|
Since the allocation for State Central Services did not result in increasing the allowable indirect amount because of the 20 percent limitation, the entire indirect cost recovery is to be coded to the agency's applicable operating fund and federal source code. |
||||||
|
4.3.3.2.4.c |
EXAMPLE 3 - Indirect Costs are Partially Reimbursable |
|
Assumptions The facts again are the same as in Example 1, except that a federal law limits indirect reimbursement for a particular grant program to 24 percent of direct costs. The agency is thus limited to a payment of $62,000 for direct and indirect costs from the federal grantor agency for work performed under a federal grant activity. The agency will receive $50,000 for direct costs and $12,000 (24 percent x $50,000) for indirect costs. |
|
Procedure - Revenue Source Coding When the $62,000 is received from the federal grantor agency, the state agency is to identify and code the federal revenue as follows: |
||||||
|
Reimbursement For |
Amount |
Account |
Source |
Sub-Source |
||
|
Agency Direct Costs |
$50,000 |
xxx |
xxxx |
xxxxxx |
||
|
Agy Indt Costs (22%) |
11,000 |
xxx |
xxxx |
xxxxxx |
||
|
Central Services |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total Revenue |
$62,000 |
|||||
|
Since the state central services allocation increases the allowable indirect rate from 22 percent to 24 percent, the two percent increase ($1,000) in recovery represents the reimbursement to the state General Fund for state central services allocated to the state agency. |
||||||