![]() |
15.10 General Policies for Acquiring Personal Services from Outside Consultants |
|
15.10.10 July 1, 2007 |
Authority for these policies |
|
State agencies must process personal service contracts in accordance with the requirements of chapter 39.29 RCW. Chapter 15 forms the uniform guidelines required by RCW 39.29.100 for the effective and efficient management of personal service contracts. |
|
15.10.15 July 1, 2007 |
Special definitions |
Agency – Any state office or activity of the executive and judicial branches of state government, including state agencies, departments, offices, divisions, boards, and commissions, and educational, correctional, and other types of institutions. |
|
| Approval – OFM's authority to analyze the filed contract or amendment and to approve or disapprove based on compliance with the competitive procurement, filing and other requirements of chapter 39.29 RCW. | |
Client Services – Services provided directly to agency clients including, but not limited to, medical and dental services, employment and training programs, residential care, and subsidized housing. Clients are considered to be those individuals who the agency has statutory responsibility to serve, protect, or oversee. |
|
Competitive Solicitation – A documented formal process for award of personal service contracts of $20,000 or more that provides an equal and open opportunity to multiple qualified parties. The solicitation culminates in the selection of a contractor based on evaluation criteria set forth in the solicitation document that may include such factors as the consultant's fees or costs, ability, capacity, experience, reputation, responsiveness to time limitations, responsiveness to solicitation requirements, quality of previous performance, and compliance with statutes and rules relating to contracts or services. |
|
| Contract Management – Activities related to contracting, including the decision to contract, contractor screening and selection, contract preparation, contract monitoring, auditing and post-contract follow-up. | |
Contract Manager – Any state agency staff involved in the contracting process (e.g. contract specialists, program managers, state agency executives, etc). |
|
Contract Monitoring – Planned, ongoing or periodic activity that measures and ensures contractor compliance with the terms, conditions, and requirements of a contract. |
|
Consultant – An independent individual or entity contracting with an agency to perform personal services by rendering an opinion or making a recommendation according to the consultant's methods without being subject to the control of the agency except as to the result of the work. The agency monitors progress under the contract and authorizes payment. The term, “contractor,” is also used in this policy and is generally used in personal service contracts. |
|
Contractor – Any business entity, whether a sole proprietor, partnership, corporation, etc., that is providing personal services to state agencies. |
|
| Emergency – A set of unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the agency that either: (1) presents a real, immediate threat to the proper performance of essential agency functions or (2) may result in material loss or damage to property, bodily injury, or loss of life if immediate action is not taken. | |
Evidence of Competition – Documentation demonstrating that the agency has solicited responses from multiple firms (minimum of three) in selecting a consultant for personal services in the amount of $5,000 to $19,999. |
|
Filing – Submission of a personal service contract or amendment, with written justification, to the Office of Financial Management for review or approval and to be made available for public inspection. |
|
Firm – Any business entity, whether a sole proprietor, partnership, corporation, etc., that is interested in providing personal services to state agencies. May also be called a “business” or qualified “party.” Also referred to as a “proposer” or “bidder” after a proposal or bid is submitted to an agency in response to a competitive procurement. |
|
| Personal Service – Professional or technical expertise provided by a consultant to accomplish a specific study, project, task, or other work statement. This term does not include purchased services as defined below. | |
Personal Service Contract – An agreement, or any amendment thereto, with a consultant (contractor) for the rendering of personal services. Personal service contracts may render services to state agencies, businesses, providers, other contractors, etc. If, however, services are provided directly to agency clients, the contracts are classified as client service contracts. |
|
Proposal – A document submitted by a firm in response to an informal or formal competitive solicitation issued by an agency. Also called a “bid.” |
|
Purchased Services – Services provided by a vendor to accomplish routine, continuing, and necessary functions. Generally, these services meet more ongoing needs of an agency for general support activities. This term includes, but is not limited to, services acquired under RCW 43.l9.190, the authority of the Department of General Administration (GA), Office of State Procurement, or RCW 43.105.041, the authority of the Information Services Board (ISB). Examples of GA purchased services include delivery/courier services, equipment rental, janitorial services, standard laboratory tests, laundry services, and towing services. Examples of ISB purchased services include computer programming, technology support, computer hardware and software maintenance, software installation, data entry, operation of a physical plant, and standard IT training related to hardware or software in use by an agency. |
|
Review – OFM's authority to analyze the filed contract or amendment based on compliance with the competitive procurement, filing and other requirements of chapter 39.29 RCW. “Review” does not authorize OFM to approve or disapprove the contract filing; however, OFM may request additional information and make suggestions regarding the filed contract or amendment. |
|
Sole Source – Contract awarded without competition, because the consultant providing the professional or technical expertise has skills, knowledge or ability of such a unique nature that the consultant is clearly and justifiably the only practical source to provide the service. The sole source award may also be based on the uniqueness or highly specialized nature of the services, sole availability of a consultant at the location required, or other special circumstance. |
|
| State Funded – Funded with dollars that are: (1) appropriated by the Washington State Legislature and/or (2) allotted by the agency. |
|
15.10.20 July 1, 2007 |
Contracts exempt from the requirements of chapter 39.29 RCW |
|
If the primary purpose or nature of a contract is in one of the categories described below, that contract is exempt from the requirements of chapter 39.29 RCW, including competitive procurement and filing. Exception: RCW 41.06.142, effective July 1, 2005, does not exempt the categories of services below from civil service competitive contracting, with one exception. If agencies want to consider the categories of services described in this subsection for competitive contracting they may, with the one exception of Interlocal agreements, referred in Subsection 15.10.20.c. Most of the services in the below exemptions are provided by contractors, but state employees do provide some of these types of services. |
|
| 15.10.20.a | Contracts Totaling Less than $5,000
However, when a sole source contract of less than $5,000 is awarded in one fiscal year and amended to add funds in another fiscal year, the total value of the amended contract is considered toward the cumulative total in the fiscal year of the amendment. For example, if a sole source contract is awarded in the amount of $3,000 in one fiscal year, and the contract is amended to add $2,000 in a subsequent fiscal year, the amendment is subject to filing since the total amended amount of the contract is now $5,000, regardless of when the amendment was awarded. In the same example, if the amendment was awarded for $1,000, it would not be subject to filing (if there were no other sole source contracts with the contractor). If a second contract was awarded to the contractor in the same fiscal year for $1,000, the second contract would be subject to filing since the amount of the first amended contracts is $4,000 and the amount of the second contract is $1,000. (For institutions of higher education, the cumulative amount is calculated differently. Refer to Subsection 15.30.25.a.) Agencies are to track personal service contracts under $5,000, so they will know when the filing threshold is met. Personal service contracts that are competitively awarded to the contractor in the state fiscal year are not included in this cumulative sole source total. |
| 15.10.20.b | Contracts Subject to Tariff |
| 15.10.20.c | Interlocal Agreements |
| 15.10.20.d | Services for a Standard Fee |
| 15.10.20.e | Contracts for Collaborative Research This exemption is only applicable when the agency initiates the activity by applying for specific funding and names the contractor(s) in the funding or grant application. Typically, the contractors named in the application would be those that would provide specialized services and whose participation would be key to project success. Conversely, contractors that provide more general services that would not impact the successful completion of the project and whose types of services are readily available from multiple firms should not be named in a grant or funding application. If a funding authority initiates an agency contract process by providing funds to an agency and requires the agency to utilize a specific contractor, the subsequent agency contract would not fit under this exemption. It would be designated as a sole source and filed with OFM, if it meets the filing thresholds. In this instance, a sole source advertisement would not be required if the contract is for $20,000 or more, since the funding source mandated the contractor to use as a condition of the award. Refer to Subsection 15.20.60.c. |
| 15.10.20.f | Contracts for Client Services |
| 15.10.20.g | Contracts for Architectural and Engineering Services However, contracts awarded by any state agency for architectural and engineering services, and their amendments, are to be reported to OFM per RCW 39.80.070. The reports are to be submitted quarterly to OFM through the Personal Service Contracts Database (PSCD). |
| 15.10.20.h | Contracts for Expert Witness Services Expert witness contracts may also include case consultation, research, legal services, or other related activities, but the purpose of the contract ultimately must be for expert witness services if the case goes to litigation or to an administrative hearing. An expert witness is someone who is a subject matter expert or has particular knowledge or skills related to a subject, not necessarily any person who might be called to testify in relation to a specific case. This exemption does not include lay witnesses. |
| 15.10.20.i | Contracts for Bank Supervision |
| 15.10.20.j | Contracts for Interpreter Services and Interpreter Brokerage Services |
|
15.10.25 July 1, 2007 |
Agency responsibilities |
State agencies subject to chapter 39.29 RCW are authorized to expend funds for personal service contracts only when the agencies have complied with the competitive procurement and other requirements of the chapter. The agency director or authorized designee has full responsibility for securing outside contractual help, as required by that agency, in the most effective and economical manner possible. The state officer or employee executing personal service contracts is responsible for ensuring that personal services are procured in accordance with chapter 39.29 RCW. |
|
15.10.30 July 1, 2007 |
Limitations on personal service contracts |
| 15.10.30.a | Agencies are to procure personal services only to resolve particular agency problems or issues or to expedite specific projects that are temporary in nature. Prior to procuring personal services valued at $5,000 or more, the agency must document that:
Contracts filed with OFM must include this information in the justification submitted with the filing. Exception: Personal service contracts awarded as a result of civil service competitive contracting under RCW 41.06.142 and chapter 236-51 WAC, are not subject to the second and third factors in this subsection. Documentation for such will not be required when filing a personal service contract awarded under RCW 41.06.142. |
| 15.10.30.b | A state agency may not enter into a personal service contract under which the contractor could charge additional costs to the agency, the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee, or the Office of the State Auditor (SAO) for access to data generated under the contract. For purposes of this requirement, “data” includes all information that supports the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the contractor’s reports, including computer models and the methodology for those models. |
|
15.10.35 July 1, 2007 |
Consequences for non-compliance |
RCW 39.29.020 provides for a civil penalty for failure to comply with the requirements of chapter 39.29 RCW. The state officer or employee executing personal service contracts shall be responsible for compliance with the requirements of the chapter. Failure to comply shall subject the state officer or employee to a civil penalty in the amount of $300. A consultant (contractor) who knowingly violates this chapter in seeking or performing work under a personal service contract shall be subject to a civil penalty of $300 or 25 percent of the amount of the contract, whichever is greater. The State Auditor’s Office is responsible for auditing violations and the Attorney General’s Office is responsible for prosecuting violations of chapter 39.29 RCW. |
|
15.10.40 July 1, 2007 |
Consider using public resources |
Agencies must consider the feasibility of using qualified public resources before using a private consultant. The following are public resources which may be available to assist state agencies:
Under the 2002 Personnel System Reform Act, agencies are not restricted from contracting for services traditionally and historically provided by state employees. Potentially displaced state employees are notified of the business problem or advantage the agency is seeking to address. The employees are then given the opportunity to formally offer improvements (alternatives) to current processes. After management review of the employee proposal, the agency then makes the decision whether to implement the employee proposed improvements or to proceed with competitive contracting. For more information on civil service competitive contracting, refer to the following website at: http://www.washingtonworks.wa.gov. |
|
15.10.45 July 1, 2007 |
Expenditure coding for personal service contracts |
|
Subobjects to be used for reporting expenditures against personal services are as follows:
Definitions for these subobjects are included in Subsection 75.70.20. |
|
15.10.50 July 1, 2007 |
Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises |
|
Chapter 39.19 RCW requires agencies and educational institutions to ensure that businesses owned and controlled by minorities (MBEs) and women (WBEs) are afforded the maximum practical opportunity to contract directly and/or to subcontract with the state and to meaningfully participate on state contracts. The Office of Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises (OMWBE) sets annual voluntary participation goals for agencies and educational institutions by class of contract. The current goals for personal (professional) services are 10 percent for MBEs and 4 percent for WBEs. Agencies may set their own internal voluntary goals at either higher or lower levels. OMWBE maintains the BizNet system which is a listing of certified minority-owned and women-owned businesses that are willing and able to do business with the state. Access to BizNet is on the OMWBE website at: http://www.omwbe.wa.gov/. No preferences may be included in the scoring of proposals for M/WBE participants and no minimum level of M/WBE participation may be required as a condition for receiving award. Proposals cannot be rejected or considered non-responsive for not including M/WBE participation. For more information, contact OMWBE at (360) 753-9693. |
|
15.10.55 July 1, 2007 |
Training on personal service contracts |
| 15.10.55.a |
Training on personal service contracts is required for all state agency staff who execute or manage personal service contracts. Those employees must complete OFM personal service contract training or agency-approved training prior to executing or managing personal service contracts. OFM provides ongoing personal service contract training for state agency personnel responsible for executing or managing these contracts. The training covers topics from contract planning and procurement through effective and efficient contract management and contract completion. Agencies may provide their own personal service contract training, if the course is approved in writing in advance by OFM. If agencies provide contract training, names of staff who have attended the training must be reported to OFM. |
||||||||||||
| 15.10.55.b |
State agencies shall require agency employees responsible for executing or managing personal service contracts to complete the applicable training course to the satisfaction of OFM prior to executing or managing these contracts. (Training is also required for those who execute or manage client service contracts, so those classes are also listed below.) Staff who execute contracts are those who sign contracts. Staff who manage contracts are those who have responsibility for the day-to-day activities of the personal service contract. These activities may include conducting the procurement, providing technical assistance to contractors, monitoring contractor activities, reviewing and approving invoices, etc. Staff who only execute or manage personal service contracts of less than $5,000 are not required to take the training, however, the training is recommended. Staff who make payments against contracts or log or track contracts, but who do not engage in other contract management activities, are not required to take the training. Executive Management training is available to a more limited audience of agency directors and assistant directors (or the management equivalent) who execute but do not manage contracts. The following table provides further information about required classes:
* If an agency provides its own OFM approved contract training, then that training satisfies the requirements. State agency staff may register for OFM training through OFM's website at: http://www.ofm.wa.gov/training.htm. All internal agency procedures for requesting training must be followed prior to registration with OFM. Attendance at the half-day client service contracts training offered by OFM will not meet the training requirement for staff who manage or execute personal service contracts. Likewise, staff who only manage or execute client service contracts would not meet the training requirement by attending the personal service classes. |
||||||||||||
| 15.10.55.c |
Any request for an employee to be exempt from this training requirement must be submitted to OFM in writing. OFM must approve the exception request prior to the employee executing or managing contracts, with few exceptions. The exemption is to be considered temporary. The employee granted the exemption must attend contract training as soon as feasible after receipt of the exemption from OFM. Multiple requests for exemption for an individual will not be approved. State agencies are responsible to ensure that staff attend training as soon as possible after receiving the exemption. |
|
15.10.60 July 1, 2007 |
Risk-based audits |
|
OFM conducts risk-based audits of the contracting practices associated with individual personal service contracts to ensure agency compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. A risk-based audit means a review of the management and fiscal controls and contracting practices associated with personal service contracts. OFM determines the number of audits to conduct and which agencies to include based on funding provided. OFM forwards the results of the risk-based audits conducted to the Governor, the appropriate standing committees of the Legislature, and the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee. |
|
15.10.65 July 1, 2007 |
Audit and investigative findings |
|
The State Auditor's Office (SAO) and the Attorney General's Office (AGO) shall annually provide a report of agency personal service contract audit and investigative findings, enforcement actions, and the status of agency resolution. The SAO and AGO submit the report to the Governor and the Legislative policy and fiscal committees by November 30th of each year. The audit findings referenced herein are those issued by the SAO and are not related to the risk-based audits conducted by OFM. |
|
15.10.70 July 1, 2007 |
Standards of ethics and conduct |
|
Chapter 42.52 RCW, “Ethics in Public Service,” applies to all state employees in all branches of state government. State employees contracting on behalf of the state are to maintain strict ethical standards and take caution to avoid any real or apparent conflict of interest situations. State employees must also be aware of requirements and restrictions regarding contracting with current or former state employees. State employees should familiarize themselves with this statute prior to entering into contracts. |